![]() When using web applications with Javascript, JQuery and other nifty stuff on a pahe it may be tougher to debug with iframes. For sites with applications embedded within the site you may see issues with debugging when using iframes. Debugging Issues with web applications.There are scripts and ways around this but, overall you are looking at a scenario of complexity that may very well be avoidable. The content opens within the iframe as expected and then they come across another link and they want to share that link with a friend, the link they share ends up taking that person to the page where the iframe is embedded and not the deep link further within the iframe. Your user is navigating a page and comes across a link and opens it. When it comes to linking and bookmarking content your users will have a limited experience when it comes to links within iframes. In my experience using iframes is not a short cut to addressing greater site architecture issues. ![]() Some may feel there is an advantage because it appears you are loading only one page with headers, footers and menus but actually you are loading all elements from both the page the iframe is embedded in and the page within the. When you use an iframe the user will be essentially loading up 2 pages at the same. There is no real performance benefit to using iframes.Since Google will not recognize content within iframes, the reason why a client may need this will need to be clarified or there may be another solution (using tags for displaying content where you will get SEO benefits). Content within iframes are not indexed by Google.Malicious sites were also able to infect a users computer with links with malicious scripts within iframes. In the past, cross site attacks were possible through malicious sites being able to infect a users computer without it being visible on the page. While cross site vulnerabilities are well known and associated with using iframes, there are ways to address security vulnerabilities now to ensure your site is safe. These are some of the main reasons we have experienced and know of. While the overall risk of negative SEO may be less than it has been in the past, there is an impact. While the impact of may not always be clear and there are some SEO experts who say there is no impact, it also does not produce SEO benefits or advantage. ![]() Moving ahead… for many businesses, organizations and individuals creating WordPress web sites and publishing content there are many reasons why should not be used and alternatives for sharing content. Support for in HTML5 is included on some browsers this does not always cross all browsers nor address specific issues on mobile devices and usability. were originally incorporated into HTML 4.0, and later banished from XHTML, only to be re-introduced into HTML5, only to have limited support in browsers for HTML5. The element is one of the oldest HTML tags and in 1997 was originally introduced by Microsoft for HTML 4.0 and was supported by the earlier versions of the Explorer. This article will show the top reasons why should not be used and provide some alternatives for embedding content. Embedding the content within a given page, allows you to view and interact with the content without having to host the any aspect of the application on a separate source. ![]() This is the basis of applications like Google Maps and YouTube. The is added to a page you are looking from one HTML page into another with all of the functionality and interactivity of the two being viewed through the one HTML document or web page. Inevitably, our team will spend however much time it takes explaining why that is not a good idea. Yes, iframes are still a consideration, even now in 2021 on occasion when developing a new website or updating an older website someone somewhere in the process says “Just use an to bring this page into the web site.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |